There is
difference between the stories given to the viewer through the narrative and
the story communicated to the audience by media language.
Media always
simplifies the overall incidence or event that audience can easily understand.
We can take example over here, camerawork can often provide us with clues to
the story that narrative won’t reveal until later.
When any
narrative tells the story it might be full of unwanted details and
explanations. Because of this the audience can lose the interest in core idea
of that particular narration.
Media languages are very easy to understand.
Visuals create better idea of that event. There are some things that narrator
unable to tell us. Such thing’s clues we can get from the visuals. Here David
Bordwell states that the narrative only gives the story to audience, but media
communicate with the audience.
When communication comes there is a though of listeners
too. Media languages made things easy to understand. For example, India America
nuclear deals details by the governments speaker, include only few points and
they are not easy to understand. And media explains same thing along with the
views of Indian nuclear scientists, general people.
So yes there
is always the difference between the stories given to the viewer through the
narrative and the story communicated to the audience by the media language.
No comments:
Post a Comment